BODY CONTENTS

PUBLICATION

Release of medium-to-long term outlook on respective agenda based
on the analysis of pending macroeconomic issues

Macroeconomics and Financial Economics

Research Monograph

Analysis on the Conflict of Interests between Financial Products Recommendation Service of Sales Channel and Retail Clients

Facebook
cover image
  • Author OH. Yoonhae
  • Date 2015/12/31
  • Series No. Research Monograph 2015-06
  • Language Korean
PDF
SUMMARY This study finds ways to resolve conflict of interests between financial products recommendation service of sales channel and retail clients in Korea. To that end, this study conducts an empirical analysis on mutual fund recommendation and fee, an on-line survey on the experience of mis-selling, and an survey of foreign cases on legal system of financial advisory.

After the global financial crisis, there is an increasing concern on consumers' financial loss from mis-selling and the asymmetric information and the complexity of financial products. Therefore, major countries, such as the UK and Australia, have made efforts to mitigate structural conflict of interests by reorganizing the legal system and regulation on the financial advisory service.

In Korean financial products market, number of complaints and disputes on mis-selling are consistently growing. Therefore, appropriate policies to mitigate the mis-selling are urgently required. In major countries with organized financial regulation and law, personal recommendation of a specific financial product is recognized as 'financial advice'. On the contrary, personal recommendation is regarded as a sales process in Korea, as 'financial advice' is not established as a legal concept for retail clients. Even though the financial authorities are considering an implementation of conflicts-free independent financial advisor, the recommendation service from current sales channel is not included as 'financial advice'.

This study confirms that sales channels' inclination to recommend relatively higher-commission products through mutual funds data, as well as Korean consumers’ perception and actual experience of conflict of interest through an online survey. It also suggests measures to promote the independent financial advice and upgrade the financial advice service by introducing recent regulatory reforms and laws on financial advice service in major countries.

Chapter 3 demonstrates that financial institutions tend to select mutual funds with higher sales fee in the recommendation lists on their web-pages. Even with regression analysis controlling other factors, fund sales fee and commission have statistically significant impact on the recommendation.

Chapter 4 carries out an online survey targeting 1,600 consumers who have ever bought insurances for investment or mutual funds within last 5 years. The result shows a considerable number of respondents experienced that sellers provided an insufficient explanation about the probability of principal loss, or they induced unsuitable higher-risk products. A regression result also shows that consumers with lower financial literacy are more likely to experience these mis-selling.

Consequently, below policies are required to protect financial consumers and invigorate independent financial advisors. First, a legal definition of financial advice should be established. Second, a structure of sales commission provided by current sales channel should be disclosed to consumers in detail. Third, financial authorities, even if not forced measures like in the UK, should suggest a balanced KPI (key performance indicators) to mitigate conflict of interest of financial advisors. Also, it is necessary to strengthen online sales platform for the pressure of competition.
More from this topicIt deals with the same topic of the content
KDI Research Category
Advanced search