contents go

KDI - Korea Development Institute

KDI - Korea Development Institute

SITEMAP

HOT ISSUE

Policy Study Energy Market Design with Local Content Requirements December 31, 2025

표지

Series No. 2025-10

Policy Study KOR Energy Market Design with Local Content Requirements #Environment and Energy #General(Other)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22740/kdi.ps.2025.10 P-ISBN979-11-7566-085-4 E-ISBN979-11-7566-110-3

December 31, 2025

  • 프로필
    Yeochang Yoon
Summary
As governments accelerate the push toward carbon neutrality―while advancing strategies for emerging industries, responding to tighter protectionism, and adapting to shifting supply chains―pressures to build domestic industrial capacity, strengthen energy security, and secure technological autonomy have intensified. Although support for renewables and low-carbon processes is expanding, preferential measures for domestic producers risk distorting price signals, weakening allocative efficiency, and increasing exposure to trade disputes. This report examines how such industrial support interacts with energy-market design and assesses the implications for market participation, competitive dynamics, and overall efficiency.

We develop an asymmetric auction model that reflects cost and capability gaps between domestic and foreign firms and incorporates a lower-bound constraint on domestic firms’ ex-ante winning probability. Within this setting, we compare three instruments: (i) horizontal measures that reduce entry costs (e.g., grid and other infrastructure investment, market and regulatory reform); (ii) conditional, flat subsidies paid when a domestic bidder wins; and (iii) market-based, multi-dimensional (scoring) auctions that award non-price premiums for domestic content. When entry costs are significant, conditional subsidies tend to dampen participation less than scoring-based linkage and can deliver higher allocative efficiency. Combining horizontal and vertical tools helps meet domestic-content objectives while limiting distortions and widening competition relative to reliance on vertical measures alone.

Building on these results, the report recommends: defining measurable short- and long-term objectives; prioritising sectors with meaningful yet bridgeable capability gaps; translating non-price scores into “equivalent subsidies” for transparent calibration; embedding regular evaluation and sunset provisions; and continuously ensuring consistency with international trade disciplines.
Contents
Abstract
Preface
Summary (Korean)

Chapter 1. Introduction

Chapter 2. Current Status and Changes in Support Policies for Industry Fostering
 Section 1. Definition and Purpose of Industrial Support Policies
 Section 2. Application Methods and Case Studies of Support Policies
 Section 3. Evaluation of Energy Industry Support Policies
 Section 4. Korea's Energy Industry Fostering Policies

Chapter 3. Model Analysis
 Section 1. Related Literature
 Section 2. The Model
 Section 3. Equilibrium Analysis

Chapter 4. Policy Implications
 Section 1. Policy Objectives
 Section 2. Selection of Support Targets and Setting of Support Levels
 Section 3. Support Methods and Policies
 Section 4. Alignment with International Trade Norms
 Section 5. Establishment of Evaluation Framework and Possibility of Modification

Chapter 5. Conclusion

References

Appendix
related materials ( 9 )
  • Key related materials
Join our Newsletter

World's Leading Think Tank, Korea Development Institute

Security code

We reject unauthorized collection of email addresses posted on our website by using email address collecting programs or other technical devices. To access the email address, please type in the characters exactly as they appear in the box below.

captcha
KDI Staff Information

Please enter the security code to prevent unauthorized information collection.

KDI Staff Information

Please check the contact information.

OK
KDI Staff Information

Please check the contact information.

OK